The Silence After the Shock
Why White America’s Rage Has So Often Pointed Down—and Why It Hesitates When Power Turns on It
By SDC News One, IFS News Writers
WASHINGTON [IFS] -- In the long, violent ledger of American history, one pattern repeats with unsettling clarity: when white Americans have felt their social order threatened from below, the response has been immediate, organized, and brutal. When the threat comes from above—from the state, from concentrated wealth, from federal power—the response has often been slower, fragmented, and hesitant.
That contrast helps explain why, even after the public killing of white citizens in plain view of cameras, the national reaction can feel oddly muted. Not absent—but restrained. Disbelieving. Polite. Almost procedural.
This is not a question of courage. It is a question of conditioning.
A History of Immediate White Rage—When the Target Was Black
American history does not suffer from a shortage of white fury. Quite the opposite.
Entire Black towns—Wilmington (1898), Tulsa (1921), Rosewood (1923)—were erased after rumors, accusations, or the mere assertion of Black political or economic autonomy. Mobs did not wait for investigations. Due process was not debated. Violence was understood as corrective, even righteous.
White mobs lynched Black men and boys for being accused, suspected, or simply present. Black families attempting to vote were met with terror. Children like Ruby Bridges required federal troops to walk into a school because white adults summoned rage at the sight of integration.
Neighborhoods were policed through intimidation. Crosses burned. Midnight rides enforced racial boundaries. Later, when spectacle violence became less acceptable, bureaucracy took over: zoning laws, redlining, “urban renewal,” highways and reservoirs deliberately routed through Black neighborhoods, all in the name of progress.
White America did not lack energy then. It had strategy. It had numbers. It had institutional backing.
Power Was Never the Target—Order Was
What united those moments was not chaos, but preservation. The violence was not revolutionary; it was conservative in the literal sense—meant to conserve a racial and economic hierarchy.
Black Americans were not threatening wealth at the top. They were threatening proximity. Schools. Jobs. Neighborhoods. Ballots. The fury flowed downward, not upward.
That distinction matters now.
Because when state power—through federal agencies, militarized policing, or immigration enforcement—turns its force inward and outward at the same time, the target is no longer “the other.” It is the abstract machinery of governance itself. And that is far harder to process for people raised to trust it.
The Shock of the Unthinkable
For generations, many white Americans were taught—explicitly or implicitly—that state violence was something that happened for them, not to them.
So when white citizens are killed publicly, and justice appears stalled or evasive, the reaction is often disbelief rather than fury. Shock instead of mobilization.
“This isn’t how it works,” becomes the unspoken refrain.
But it has always worked this way—just not for them.
Why the Streets Feel Quietly Wrong
There are marches. There are chants. There are signs. But the tone can feel strangely restrained—almost social. Smiling. Costumed. Managed.
That is not because people do not care. It is because many have not yet crossed the psychological threshold that Black Americans crossed long ago: the realization that the system is not malfunctioning—it is functioning as designed.
Black Americans learned, through blood and repetition, that cameras do not guarantee justice. That visibility does not equal accountability. That dignity is not automatically recognized.
So when some Black voices now say, “We’re sitting this one out,” it is not indifference. It is historical exhaustion.
For generations, Black Americans fought for a democracy that promised inclusion and delivered surveillance. They marched when white Americans stayed home. They warned when others laughed. And in recent years, many were actively opposed—at the ballot box and in public discourse.
Solidarity is not an infinite resource.
The Myth That Delays Revolt
Another factor stalls urgency: the American Dream.
Many white Americans still believe—consciously or not—that proximity to power is possible. That today’s injustice is an anomaly, not a pattern. That tomorrow they might join the ranks of those protected rather than targeted.
That belief dampens rage. It turns resistance into negotiation.
If you think the system might still work for you, you hesitate to confront it.
Citizenship, Rights, and a Dangerous Falsehood
Some voices insist that only certain people deserve due process—that rights belong exclusively to “foundational” citizens. That is not how the Constitution works. Courts have repeatedly affirmed that due process applies to persons, not just citizens.
But the persistence of this belief reveals something deeper: a hierarchy of worth that has always existed in practice, if not law.
Once that hierarchy becomes unstable—once people previously protected find themselves exposed—the moral math changes. Slowly.
The World Is Watching—And So Is History
Other nations are watching what happens when a majority population experiences what minorities have long endured: public killing, delayed justice, official silence.
The question is not whether white Americans are angry. Many are.
The question is whether that anger will finally turn upward—toward concentrated power, unaccountable institutions, and a political economy that feeds on division—or whether it will dissolve back into denial.
A Closing Truth
If democracy is to work for everyone, those who have historically benefited most from it will have to fight for it without expecting others to absorb the blows.
History shows that white America has never lacked energy.
The only unanswered question is what—and who—it is finally willing to use it against.
Peace.
- 30 -
No comments:
Post a Comment